Tries to express them in more words

mostakimvip06

The most interesting thing is that the work of each artist constitutes a new world. And that's what we need. The perception prevails that when we are gripped by the instinctive desire stemming from our childhood to go to the cinema and indulge in its myths we will see a technically flawless American film Spielberg's. But when we feel the need to dive into the abyss of the human soul we will prefer European creators like Bergman Fellini or Visconti. Do you agree with this dichotomy. And just as you can't have too many relationships in your life, so you can't meet too many artists, or too many philosophers, or too many thinkers. For some reason during my life I happened to "get attached" to some artists, thinkers, or other important people.

Discriminations based on national criteria do e-commerce photo editing not help the approach to art. They merely serve as lifelines for historians and teachers. The real creator is not limited or exhausted by national and historical boundaries. The United States contributed much to the history and development of cinema but at the same time stifled it by unilaterally exploiting and capitalizing on its power power to impose ways of life and generate profits. The few great filmmakers who have lived and worked in.



America but in any country there are few anyway have had to either ostensibly play the game of industrial production in order to exist and allow their work to be born see in part our the system so that only a very specialized audience learns about them see our also partly our John Cassavetes. After all no important creator wherever he comes from can be called a creator without spirituality what you called soul. However what is never enough in art is simply being a master. Their work shaped me. Perhaps even the verb "happened" is not entirely correct. Random encounters also hide a predisposition or a specific quest.