Regal Credit Finance Limited

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 102|回復: 0

Therefore, whether it is an art work

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

7

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
7
發表於 2024-3-11 11:35:06 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
AI causes copyright issues Outside the school, the moral issues of AI itself have caused art teachers to raise serious doubts about the new AI drawing tools, which points directly to another crucial issue - copyright . Since AIGC became popular, illustration work in many industries has become much easier. Taking the media industry as an example, serious media have high requirements for news graphics, which must not only conform to the meaning of the text, but also be responsible for copyright.


Therefore, whether it is an art work or a photo, it is either created by hand or comes from Indonesia Telegram Number Data an authorized library. However, many articles are subject to objective conditions, and it is not easy to find a matching picture that meets the requirements. With the advent of AI drawing, many media people have begun to try to use AI to draw accompanying pictures, or even directly draw portraits of news figures.







So if you post a picture you made using AI, it won’t be an infringement, right? This question is really not certain. In the second half of , just after AIGC became popular, some well-known artists protested against AI drawing. In , many American artists such as Erin Hanson launched protests against Stable Diffusion. They believed that some of the paintings generated by Stable Diffusion plagiarized their styles, and this behavior seriously violated their legal rights. Although AIGC is called AI generation, it does not have the ability to create itself. It can only imitate the human production process through continuous learning.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|Regal Credit Finance Limited

GMT+8, 2024-5-15 00:42 , Processed in 0.033123 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表