To talk about utopias we had to start

chandon

Europe in the late Middle Ages and early modern times, trying to build the Kingdom of God on earth10. from there, from Thomas Müntzer and the Peasants' War, because there was the modern idea that the world that our ideals outline can be achieved in practice if we fight for it, that the future can be build through the struggles of the present. This genealogy that begins with a peasant revolt constitutes a completely different vision of utopia than the one that derives it from a fictional literary text like that of Thomas More; Ultimately, this was conceived as a witty joke in the author's dialogue with.

Erasmus of Rotterdam, whom he intended to expose for the ridiculousness of pursuing Italy Email List dreams, such as that of the universal monarchy encouraged by the court humanists. of Charles v. In this alternative genealogy, typical of central Europe, utopia is a hopeful struggle, it is a social movement that changes the world, it is not unattainable fiction (since it is the latter that is meant by the subtle play on cultured words devised by More from Greek roots). : that the good place, eu-topia , is unattainable, because it is at the same time a non-place, ou-topia ). In the limit, this conception of utopia as an instrument for constructing a better future was what inspired Ernst Bloch to write his two key works on the subject, The Spirit of Utopia (1918) and The Principle of Hope (1938- 1947)eleven.




Well, this alternative way of conceiving utopias as experiences that transform reality – and not as a museum of innocuous fictions – has predominated among Latin American authors, both those who have been related to the academic environment of utopian studies and those who have not. . And perhaps this is one of the reasons why they are not part of the mainstream of academic studies on the subject on a global scale. The topic of America as a utopian continent, which the first essayists used to reread the era of geographical discoveries and the Spanish-Portuguese conquest, later came to represent something else: an argument in favor of a rebellious Latin America, which would not be conforms to its present.